αe:
(ᘒ,(≠፨),(≠ᚼ),⚘,◊) + Æ {
    (Twins,Parents,Doctors)/ʃT(immediate);(Media,La voluntad de reparación,El pánico ante lo queer)/ʃT(environmental);(Normative anatomy,Psychology,Gender Binary)/ʃT(structural);
    } + {
    (Twins,Parents,Doctors):(©+Δ);(Media,La voluntad de reparación,El pánico ante lo queer):(∃+Δ+a);(Normative anatomy,Psychology,Gender Binary):(Δ+≠);
    } + { 
      (Twins,Parents,Doctors):("+♞);(Media,La voluntad de reparación,El pánico ante lo queer):(...+♙+");(Normative anatomy,Psychology,Gender Binary):(...,...); 
    } ??? {
(Twins,Parents,Doctors):(...+...);(Media,La voluntad de reparación,El pánico ante lo queer):(...+...);(Normative anatomy,Psychology,Gender Binary):(...+...);

•   } = QÆ (QUEERING DAMAGE OR N)

:αK



https://queeringdamage.hangar.org/index.php/OPERATION_1#David_Reimer


(Ghost is missing)
The problematic on the not only human, the entity to measure from.. 

Queer analyst method: not select, but try all categories on a situation. Allow for everything to be present. But when a problem becomes too wide, it becomes unthinkable. How to describe the unthinkable, what writing techniques? Barad: not mapping everything, but making a cut. Not descriptive, but from/through urgency. Reduction vs cutting apart. Deciding actively, assuming responsibly. Other things are still there but are decided out of the frame, temporarily.
How transversal is analytics. Patterns, logic. "Cambridge Analytics"

Encapsulation of (certain styles of) analytics/logic in hegemonic modes; to dislodge this has political potential?

Saying what we cannot say?
Is the negation working in affirmative sense ... 
we just can say what we cannot say.

Difference or negative

Does the formula close down the speculative?

Minus
Difference
Is not
Not-only
More than

Critical potential of silence. It is not quiet, absence, nothingness.

-tech ideologies? [YES]

[somehow the axiom divisions should be there too]

*Operation: Situation

Queer analytics invites us to wonder together about the potential of microbial, animal, plant, mineral, cosmological technoscience, to situate ourselves in these mundane and alluring scenes, to consider these labours and imagine a collective life otherwise. It asks us to ponder the possibilities and limitations of informatics and to take seriously the affective forces of nonhuman animals and machines. How might we extend queer theories that concern personal injury into more-than-human ensembles, in order to consider the damages shared by humans and nonhumans? How can we generate ways that take us beyond reparative narratives or benevolent utopianism towards more-than-human life?

Helen Pritchard, Jara Rocha, Laura Benítez. Queering damage: methodologies for partial reparations ... or not (2018)

https://queeringdamage.hangar.org/index.php/OPERATION_0

*Operation: Bringing damages

https://queeringdamage.hangar.org/index.php/OPERATION_1

*Operation: Questionnaire

• What is going on here?
• Which are the agents implied (alive or not, human or not, powerful or powerless)?
• Wheres (spatiality / situatedness / displacements / distribution)?
• Whens (temporality / durability / existing / extinct / repeated)?
• Semiotic-materialities: what signs and matters are at work in this ensemble?
• Your entanglement with the scene
• Can a pattern be identified here? To what extent is this damage structural, or singular?

*Operation: Incomplete reading



*Operation: Subculturing

*Operation: From damage to queer damage, drawing the complexity of a landscape

1. Define your field of interest. Cut apart and together an area of urgency. Set the scene, through naming the fields: 

• ᘒ  ፨ ᚼ  ◊  ᗶ

2. Declare your AE, Entangled Agents (myth, technology, ...):

• ^ + Æ (DAMAGE)

3. Divide by the axioms of αe (ethics) and αK (Kapital):

• αe
• [formula]
• αK

4. Where/when: Define the spacetime conditioning: (ephemeral, eternal, cyclic, linear, continuous, eventual, historical present, memory, extincted, dreamed, extended, distributed, dissoluted, dispersed, concentrated, catalized, centrifugal, centripetal, located, situated, regional, local, global, reachable, micro, meso, macro...) 

• ʃT 

5. Talking about relations. Analyze and notate the Æ through a consideration of its Variable Relations (Ω repair, Δ damage, a affects, E effects, (c) creative force, ≠difference) 

• ∫ = ^ + ∬ / (xΩ , xΔ, xa, x∃, x©, x≠)

6. Apply at least one Generative Operation for your analysis, to see what it would do. Queering operations. These are tricky, they require you to take responsibility. Define their scale:

• >> + i + * + # + " + ♥ + ↺ + ♙ + ♞ + ↺ + ✵ + ⚕

7. declare your QÆ = qH+qNH+qIH+qF+qd, declare the reconfigured entanglement: 

• (tΩ , tΔ, ta, t∃, t©, t≠)

8. Divide by the axioms of αe (ethics) and αK (Kapital)

• αe
• [the rest of the formula goes here]
• αK

9. Name the other end of the equation: 

• QÆ (QUEERING DAMAGE OR N)

*GENERATIVE OPERATIONS (potentials for queering; modes of intervention):

>> remediate
^ scale timespace to n 
i integrate 
* multiply 
# speculate 
" renarrate 
♥ love 
↺ protest 
♙ resist 
♞ reclaim
↻ invent
✵ flip
⚕ celebrate

*VARIABLE RELATIONS (a declaration of the relations in your scene of damage that you are you attending to):

Ω repair
Δ damage 
a affects 
∃ effects 
© creative force 
≠ difference 

*AXIOMS

αe axiom of ethics (survival, caretaking, respect, responsability) 
αK Kapital (accumulation, acquisition, growth) 

*FIELDS

ᘒ On the experience and process of damage and pain, partial reparation, loss/disposession 
፨ On queer politics and methodologies, contestation, affirmation 
ᚼ On contesting anthronormativities 
⚘ On bioeconomies, lively capital, accumulation 
◊ On computation, analytics, bioinfotech 
ᗶ On political fictions, poethics, figurations &/or wild fantasies, opportunities

colonialism
nationalism