Guided tour 2 -- Helen Pritchard
Falling in love / the dolphin and the geographer...
http://possiblebodies.constantvzw.org/inventory/?039
Drawing on Ahmed's work
"Femke and Jara riffing off each other"
volumetric type technologies
A safe space to do research -- clumsiness as a queer concept
crip studies
queer ethics of engaging with things
bodies do or don't obey commands
clumsiness ethics in a world of straight lines
activities that bring you up against wall
disobedient (computational) paths
Probable -- a generative possibility
smashing methodologies
http://possiblebodies.constantvzw.org/inventory/?033
ethic of clumsinessawkward lumpy mass
encact clumsy widening? in relation to so called nature objects
the eiffeltower, a tree and a bracelet
it is not made of straight lines
no hard boundary
this opens up for ossibiities of 3D printing that inhabits space-time of plants,
space-time of plants
not one-to-one
think of practices of 3D printing
shoot soot ?
microwave a potato, take pictures, and that's how to record its
what a frog sounds like
or doesn't
this problematize the idea of "perfect mapping of reality"
are these human and non-human bodies that include ... soil ... climates
body in motion, always in the process of re-orientating
exile and home coming
disorientating ouselves away from objects -- like trying this inventory --
movement of arrival and departure in which you start orienting yourself towards objects in the inventory
new spaces, new objects
re-orienting away
"things just compute"
ref. Wendy Chun
the only way computers can be transparent (mith: you can't have correlation between data and representation) is forgetting processes
item 33 alert us to the forgettings
each of the items could be thought of as a way to generate new proposals in order to orient towards other ways to relate with 3D...
(entanglements)
how this body in motion will orient towards other practices not in terms of attention with the efficiency, but of clumsy computation?
desire for efficiency vs clumsy computation
vs particular musculous straight lines that efficiency orients us towards
re-rotate Pascal's object again
rememberBarad about the queerness of life. Organic or inorganic, animate or inanimate is not an ufolding algorithm
"straying from calculable parts" (Barad)
life itself is already inventive
think about the inventiveness of matter and/or the inventiveness of life
perhaps re-work the notion of inventive?(alerting from its colonial past)
ripping out inventing of its imperial and colonial past
thinking about posthumanism and new-materialis, thinking as inventory as modes of creativity and
depressing 3d-modelling
easy to fall into the loop
it is not inert matter
framework of trans*materialities, taken from Barad
trans is quite a difficult process, even in trans-disciplinary situations
Barad: "the imaginative capacities": the speculative space of matter
transwork is difficult, but also has a compliancy to mapping
reticulence (!), resistance
ripping innovation out of neo-liberal business of invention and inventiveness
computation doesn't care, but we form attachment
optimism keeps us in proximity
Vicky Kirby (?) (from Harvey and Knot?)
there's a particular optimism that we must have (not as in goodism), but that keeps us in proximity
how to (not) make a difference while wanting to change things
reminiscent of particularforms that have remanescence in geography -- and those have been used in the anthropocene discussion
volumetrics and geologists
ideaof the human body ofnow having such a form that is actually affecting earth forms
changes in volume: climate, xxxx
anthropocene naturalizes a particular kind of volumentrics
this may lead us to one in particular(linking atropocene and volumetrics) one industry about mining
modelling around mining
[---> one addition to the continuum: extractivist industry!]
feminst technosciences working on the microbiome: bacterias moving between bodies and the environment
obviously has been worked to think about the ontology of the body
jamie lorimer - how might we re-wild the microbiom?
what do bacteria do to the ontology of the body
---
http://possiblebodies.constantvzw.org/inventory/?035
Sina's dificult forest: proposes us to understand the forest as a particular
memoirs, the forrest as a lively inventive and creative body
develop a memoir of the forrest, not a reproduction/scan
who gets to use these tech
for instance google has been doing a massive forest mapping project
Vicky kirby?:
quantum anthropologies
magic of translation between local and global -> fornsic 3D modellingand what kinds ofproblematics that brings
collecting datasets asa mystical act
local - global
diffractive memory
the surface is encounterd, but what does it mean to encounter surfaces?
it affects us and we affect it
think about the diffractive method, an emergent feminist tool, to think about differences and alternatives
http://possiblebodies.constantvzw.org/inventory/?053
barad's diffraction: she discribes when clouds and moon somehow merge, and that effect does not belong to any of them
fuzzy things around the moon
emergences that are processesof bending, spreading, and how things disrupt surfaces
diffraction is an optical metaphor
it's easy to think about what these tech can't do, but that's only if we think about representations, not if we think about diffractive practices
the way a particular apparatus is used to see light (particules)
not how to create clear limits, but to see how differences can emerge
a located scanning without a fixed location
in sina's work there is a particular body involvement: body is not a stable entity
what does it mean in computational modelling as to the phisics barad uses to that?
Haraway has been thinking about the way in which the researcher should recognise herself as entangled
how the researcher gets entangled
no mutually witnessing here
it's definitely not a method in which the researchand the researcher are not separated
visibility/invisibility of researchers in tools, technologies
we look at video of Haraway
readng national geographic to primates
thinking about interenet cats
look at particular stories of this
it matters what matters, it matters what stories
what knows know knows
what stories tell stories
what world world worlds
it matters what matters
layer-cake as the research
partial perspective: we are always choosing a cut
describing crumbs as the troubles and pleasures of research
we cannot stand back
sticky, messy situation and we are implicated
the diffractive methods allows space for the tools to do with research, not just to observe them
might be throught the smell of machinery, or 3D printers...etc
sensorial qualities of research -- in difficult forest there is a real sensorial
ref difficult forrest and how it smells
modelling shell surfaces (it is a massive area in 3d modelling)
to the understanding of shell formation -- a genealogy (quite long) of shell modeling
from descartes' understanding of generative curves, for example
shell morphologies and their possible forms
the possible shell bodies -- what makes a sucesfull model and one thats not sucesful? --> a descriptive one would be taken as successful
non-occuring forms
species categories and their racism through modelling non-occuring forms
the hyperbolic space -- flipping in-out, forwards-backwards
http://possiblebodies.constantvzw.org/inventory/?005
thank you for jumping scale from bacteria to mining/extractivism
lisa nakamura
clumy means not glitchy (in compitation)
awkward and clumsy? vs diffraction?
different relations to the obstacle -- different behaviour to that of diffraction rays
(staying with the trouble)
dilettantism -- to learn -- to do it yourself
professionalism
erin manning diffracted by kerby
matter and meaning
giving (?) access to world