JCOMMUNICATION meeting 
Naast moniqyue 30 jan - 

1. TABLE OF PRESENTATION
2.  24th report ?
3.  Remember AG > little comitees ( extern) (intern) - Role of commitees (yes - no) + Coordination
4.  

• communication externe (20 min)

• • - social medium (facebook/ ...)
  • - website
  • - mailing list (migration
  • - flyer

• Communication interne (15 min)

• • - mailbox
  • - website
  • (tasks?)

5. finance - do we need to pay somebody
6 archives

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. TABLE OF PRESENTATION

• present /steven - he * vic - she * byrthe - she *sofie - she * friend - mainly he * stitch - he/princess * merce - they she he

2.  24th ? - there was no meeting
3.  Remember AG > little comitees ( extern) (intern)

• Role of commitees (yes - no) + Coordination

The conversation involves all elements of the agenda points, which becomes chaotic and reverse in time as people go and come (after 1h of meeting and less concentration)
Some concerns of AG are differently understood by different people. Processes of decision differs during the meeting : sometimes it is handshaking, other times it is voting, sometimes it feels like trying to find consesus.

/Intern / extern we are a group of people in different places, we don't live here, we have different purposes some are into festivities/politics  Are little comitees efficient ? 

4.  

• communication interne

What follows are discussions whether we have to go for for immediate implemetation (let's make it now) evaluation of tools and best practices exemples and how to organize.

• Mailinglist >  for inbetween communication
• Mailinglist are more dispersed 
• Mailingslist are chaotic 
• Mailingslist stimulate collective organisation  and have archives 
  • people who later join: could read the archives but is intense labour
  • maybe the archives are not important as it is social talk - and better to have good documentation to publish and share in AG and do we need to know ? (is it valid information for archive)
  • And/ or each group decides for themselves which medium to use
  • - what about privacy ? 
  • - who can make mailinglist if necessary - riseup alex ?

• • • - naastmonique-com-extern@lists.riseup.net
    • - naastmonique-com-intern
    • - naastmonique-program
    • - naastmonique-budget
    • - naastmonique-lieu
    • - naastmonique-incl
• FORUM a good idea ?
• per group (communication, programming, gestiondelieu,...) has a 'page'  'is a topic' 'a subject' + person has administrator /moderation rights > 
• work task group published documentation of meeting
• everybody can post (comment) (discuss) 
• coordination  of all 'groups'> so you can read the different groups if you wanna follow 
• has an archive + all inclusive + 
  • worktask groups can have private conversations
  • exemple: https://framateam.org/
  • exemple:  https://sotacommunity.discussionforum.co/
  • exemple: http://www.xooit.com (was using in the past) / forum 

• team effort  ?
• have a good export tool!
• or do we do it ( if we do now + )
• FORUM > DISCUSSION >  for the content + coordination of the different task groups

4.  

• communication externe (20 min)

SPLIT - for active public /  - for institutional ?

discussion on how to assess the public we want to attract or how to fear of unwanted troublemakers and and how to include others  
in realtion with different commercial and free sofwtare tools/technologies and

• • - protocol - >  charte -  is easier to communicate  otherways  personal contact can be difiicult - there has to be a WE statement
  • - social medium (facebook/ ...)
    • * questioning facebook as a tool /medium 
    • * what are alternatives? 
      • - encourage and teach other medium
      • - more flyering 
      • - or passing the information differently

• • • 'as organisation of practcies of others' 
    • • * exemple / yesterday, Alex wanted to have a party for his operation and he wanted to use facebook.
      •  who use facebook can they ? can it be legimate?
      • NO FACEBOOK EVENT
      • Naast Monique make the website (give us a small text) and you refer to the website
        • - no facebook : make a private event  ! avec un lien vers notre site web
        • - no adress on facebook :  no name of place !
    • 'as place'
      • NO FACEBOOK 
  • - website
    • https://naastmonique.pink
    • self hosted machine, located somwhere in brussels
    • (yunohost - ssh command lineaccess to update html webpage) (access alex + ooooo)
    • - can the website become the channel communication  ?
      • <> discussion 
      • - how to update / who can update ?
      • - how to deliver content ? (whicf format : dates / title / organizer
      • - we want a calendar 
      • - we want a CMS : content managment system - database
  • - mailing list (migration) : collectrix-all@lists.riseup.net : 84 members , contacts can be exported  to new list (alex his admin at the moment)
  • - mailbox / make emailadress / naastmonique@riseup.net  (pasword will be spread by vic for who wants to take active control)
  • - flyer
    • - do we need to make flyers? how many ? 
    • - who can distribute them ?

5. finance - do we need to pay somebody ?
different opinions does it stay collective intelligence/praxis or is it an individual 'job'  
or for an intern - from some school or is that too heavy responsibility

6. Archives

Resolution:
What about the meta structure of communication ? it is a big topic / let's first prioritize ?
we need another session
steven / has a contact - julien who can help us * during th e meeting he al ready asked without consensus. yeah - do-cracy


-------------------

TO DO
merce /architecture of documention - coordination 
merce / initiate framadate
byrthe / proposal a architecture for website
vic /naastmoniek@riseup.net  - AG
ooooo/ documentation the meeting + update html 
Vic  / gives content for website

-------------------


ADD
what are alterntive agenda's to communicate on 
- demosphere,
- indymedia
-.....