Welcome to Etherpad!
This pad text is synchronized as you type, so that everyone viewing this page sees the same text. This allows you to collaborate seamlessly on documents!
Get involved with Etherpad at
http://etherpad.org
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/161/960229.html
http://www.kaaitheater.be/en/e1171/continuous-project-altered-daily/
How to counter the very sterilization of collective forms of experience, as well as the general tendency of a self isolation that weighs on our present ? How to invent ways of being together, while imagining a cooperation of intelligences ? Which situation is to be achieved, so that the equality of everyone and anyone could be verified, and give way to the invention of an unpredictable common ? How to reassess alteration as a motor allowing for identification ?
This intervention wishes to reverberate this very fact : if art can be passed down, it is first of all because it is itself the operator of the collective without which no transmission could ever be achieved.
Nenad Romic aka Marcell Mars, Work on Border
There are a very few expert fields where software tools didn’t become the essential part of their craft and workflows [1]. The adoption of software binds together, as Nathan Ensmenger [2] writes, “machines, people, and processes in an inextricably interconnected and interdependent system” which never goes without “conflict, negotiation, disputes over professional authority, and the conflation of social, political, and technological agendas. Software is perhaps the ultimate heterogeneous technology. It exists simultaneously as an idea, language, technology, and practice.”
Through historical overview of boundary work [3] or demarcation of science, scientific disciplines and other professionals fields and comparative analysis of the same processes for computer software world I will try to bring into the light the very moment of a convergence or a takeover of all school of thoughts by one: bureaucratic formalization; in latest incarnation: software tools.
[1]
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workflow
[2] Ensmenger, Nathan. The Computer Boys Take over?: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 2010.
[3] Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. « American Sociological Review » 48 (6): 781. doi:10.2307/2095325.
.
VARIOUS
http://metacommunitiesofcode.org/
http://p2pfoundation.net/Christopher_Kelty_on_the_Culture_of_Free_Software
http://archive.org/details/git-history-of-linux
Eric Raymond on version control
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2002-12/0822.shtml
http://draftback.com
(actual speed)
http://jsomers.net/blog/jimbopad
http://lgru.pad.constantvzw.org:8000/33
http://lgru.pad.constantvzw.org:8000/60
http://dashes.com/anil/2010/09/forking-is-a-feature.html
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/forking.html
Annotated videos
http://activearchives.org/aaa/tags/Undo/
Related notes
http://fs.pad.constantvzw.org:8000/48
http://archive.org/details/The_Basement_Interviews
http://archive.org/stream/The_Basement_Interviews/Eric_Raymond_Interview_djvu.txt
http://tom.preston-werner.com/2009/05/19/the-git-parable.html
http://www.aosabook.org/en/git.html
COLLABORATION
Linda Zerelli: Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom
SG: Mark Miessen in conversation with Chantal Mouffe
http://www.aaronvandyke.net/summer_readings/Miessen-Democracy%20Revisited%20conversation%20w%20Chantal%20Mouffe.pdf
+
http://www.wdw.nl/event/welcome-to-harmonistan-a-lecture-by-markus-miessen/
in written:
http://www.sternberg-press.com/index.php?pageId=1270&bookId=165&l=en
Chantal Mouffe:
Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces
http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/mouffe.html
Art and democracy
http://www.skor.nl/_files/Files/OPEN14_P6-15%281%29.pdf
Can design by committee work
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/09/01/the-case-for-open-source-design-can-design-by-committee-work/
Science Fiction for the Multitudes:
Interview with Christoph Spehr
http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0306/msg00049.html
Gleicher als andere:
http://www.opentheory.org/gleicher/text.phtml
and
http://www.republicart.net/art/concept/alttransspehr_en.htm
http://www.desorg.org/titols/on-rules-and-monsters-an-introduction-to-free-cooperation/
Geert Lovink -- The Principles of Notworking
http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/portal/publications/geert-lovink-publications/the-principle-of-notworking/
Richard Sennett -- Together
Chris Kelty -- The Cultural Significance of Free Software
Tyranny of structurelessness
http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
Other Feminist writers on this? (maybe Judith Butler ref Hate Speech?)
Isabelle Stengers -- Ecology of Practices
Eleanor Greenhalgh
http://consentsus.org/
Simona Levi + Fork
http://conservas.tk/english/tactics/
Check Hacker Manifesto
Geoff Cox -- Speaking Code
Collaborative Futures: Ownership and conflict
http://www.booki.cc/collaborativefutures/ownership-control-conflict/
Journal of peer production: The Critical Power of Free Software
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/
VERSIONS, DIFFERENCE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff
Le différent (Lyotard :-/)
Variantology
http://variantology.com/
Michel De Certeau -- The Writing of History
GitHub's Wild West Approach To Licensing Has Hidden
Costs
http://readwrite.com/2013/07/16/githubs-wild-west-approach-to-licensing-has-hidden-costs
Open Source Is Old School, Says The GitHub Generation
http://readwrite.com/2013/05/15/open-source-is-old-school-says-the-github-generation
Linus Torvalds on GIT
http://activearchives.org/aaa/resources/1036/
SVN vs GIT?
probably need something on Remix culture
PRODUCTION, WORKFLOWS
text on how git is used as cv