http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.afterlives
http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.inventory
http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.guide --> 1-2 December

LAST ROUNDS 2 DECEMBER

Planning

Before January 9:
- Finish descriptions of clusters (Martino? + Femke?)
- Finish introduction (Done for now? Maybe another round on Feb. 9?)
- Interview Jean Huens + transcription (Peggy)
- Establish a level of editing that shows a balance between documentation and guidance (all of us try to finish the entries we took on)
- Finish pdf to a point that no content is missing and we can start discussing design (Christoph)

Meet January 9, 20h CET (1.5 hr meeting max)
- See what still needs to be done
- Send out e-mail to TGSO list: deadline 29 January

[Carlin starts editing]

9 February 12h CET: we meet to finish whatever needs to be done 
Carlin joins at 16h CET

End February: print

Main pads:
http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.methods
http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.guide

---

Carlin's questions
- editing process
"If you are writing, you have liberties" - if necessary, ask people who were involved in the thing to 
- order of entries
http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.guide
- incorporation of photographs, diagrams, etc
YES!
- small note (visit computer collections appears twice in the current html)
(probably ok now?)

look for phrases / ways for introducing the chapters/groupings. Could be just a line? A task for someone?
Test: http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.guide.grouping.temporality

Introduction http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.guide.introduction Peggy + FS + Seda first round

Add reference to the walk-in clinic? A description. Unlike normal guides: we have not removed the process. WARNING: there will be a mix of abstractions and concrete experiences.

Carlin works on 3 entries

The interview needs to be done -> Peggy

Hans e-mail -> Martino
Ana + Ricardo -> Femke

For each of the chapter descriptions: quote from the materials/reader? Could be an image. Or a short inspirational phrase? -> Martino tries
http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/observatory.guide

An email to other TGSO participants, call for help/see if further material is available (once the PDF is more stable)

WARNING: pad fatigue might occur

latex todo:
* be able to force empty new lines  (f.ex to put back lines in scrollresistance)
* differentiate code quotes from pad quotes





SAS Survival Handbook: The Ultimate Guide to Surviving Anywhere 
https://archive.org/stream/SASSurvivalHandbookTheUltimateGuideToSurvivingAnywhere/AppNee.com.SAS.Survival.Handbook.2nd.Edition#page/n359/mode/2up
The  Rudiments Of Wisdom encyclopaedia by Tim Hunkin.
http://www.rudimentsofwisdom.com

issue: different materials. works well to situate the week. fr an interview, a good way to introduce. but with folders, code ... so brought the SAS guide. What is good about that it is very loose ... different layers, zooms ... 
flowing things from one into the other .. not too formulaic. find ways to jump different tones.
multiplicity of tones. so ... something in-between the two

template as a way to make the connection back to the original questions ... what are the things to pay attention to, to give space to it.

we did not do any grouping, but maybe that could be interesting to try?

we were testing observatory method, the chronological order to prevent us from paying too much attention to the clinic and would also look at the exercises and thinking from the first days. 

could each method then propose its form/content?

even to have chapters that have no entry or only an introduction and no methods, to play the templating without feeling that we have to fulfil that template 

http://observatory.constantvzw.org/documents/mia/mia6.gif

noise is back,

test: make a round of groupings / hierarchies affinities
test: make more methods
test: other templates

seda wondering about us defining different types of participants: stationary (that's us), migratory (but some stayed), walk-in (visitors to the clinic), sedentary ... was that a method?
do all the methods need to be related to software? YES but WHAT IS SOFTWARE

sing through and to the hardware and software

what is the 'entrypoint'(element from inventory?)-method relation
methods as a way to label and address things, still keeping open to other materials to enter (ie interview..)

Everything in the guide is a METHOD, but how do we group and groom the methods???

Do we do a publication, an event .. the fact that we have been through an event, and even that we describe it, means we are developing the methods.<- is this like observation transforms the method!?
So: is this documentation, or will we open it to new input. Ongoing.

Difference between documentation and publication

Exampe: e-mail of jogi. 
That report is already published and structured? It is an easier ongoingness -- to accept other contrib

ongoingness? thinking it structured around the week, and its participants. if you have not been involved, it is difficult to understand?

Who is it for? Do we want it to be of use? The difference between documentation and publication is the imagined audience
documentation: audience is the participants, does not have the ambition to be legible to non-participants
publication: a broader audience (with contributions from other participants but not from those who did not participate in the work session) who would be able to pick it up and understand the techno-galactic condition


Can we decide on a few kinds of formats and test them
- one can be a breakdown like on the methods list
- one can be more just description/summary/exericse

we look at the methods
and other forms of documentation
see if the proposed structure works
specifically:
7:20 CET back to discuss

Peggy:

For the interview ... something that could be easily done, short bio interview with 2-3 q to the participants. Easy to do, and a bit is already done in the introductions. Would be good to have it in the guide for people that have not been involved. Carlin likes this too!
P. still likes to do long interview with mr. Huens.
Would like to write down the visit to the museum as an 19th century explorer .

Martino: groupings can certainly work. It can work, and connections are interesting. Two ways to go through? -- going to the groupings now -- 

Templates
Groupings

Seda filled her own template ... now on line 116 .. "Testing the testbed"

Anita: liked the grouping. Tension between formal and conceptual groupings. 
In case of doubt, turn to the SAS survival handbook.

How will we get this done?
[[WARNING: This is epic and may take the rest of our lives.]]

2 days *full on* will intensively generate lot of material. 
where would we be after?
 what do we need before then?

Carlin joins Friday afternoon CET

THE WEEKEND (DEC 1/2, 2017)

A beginning of an introduction

A certain amount of methods (common and uncommon)

A structure

--
AFTERWARDS

Peggy: the interview 

open up to contributions from participants [what space remains?]
facilitate a response

Transcription
QR code in paper publication?

Marking up
Design/production
Editing

paper publication: small but many
pocket guide

let's not worry now about the level of editing/publication ... a publication or documentation?
not sure yet what to do with non-text materials
how to make sure there is also sth accessible on-line

2400

BUDGET UPDATED 14/11/2017
Printing/binding 375 (+ print on demand) [so that's 125 copies or so? depends]
Design 1000 -- Christoph Haag!
Train Christoph -- 200
Transcription interview 200 -- Peggy
Editing 400 -- Carlin
Translation (intro?) -- we do it ourselves
train tickets 150 -- Peggy, Anita
food weekend -- 75

(can Christoph come?) YES



- contact Christoph before 1 december DONE
- peggy records interview before 1 december

start Friday 10h
Concentrate most of the work
Carlin joins 4pm - 6pm

Saturday start 12h stop at 18h
Handover with Carlin at 17h
[FS meeting Christoph in the morning, and evening]


CARLIN's AVAILABILITY
4pm - 6pm CET (7am - 9am PST)
(PST Friday afternoon and evening)
4pm CET onwards on Saturday (7am PST)
<3 <3 <3



Methods for (engaged) observation of software

An inclusive list of methods that appeared during the worksession. 
Question: are we validating if they are "interesting or even "engaged"? If the object is produced by the mode of observation. or what if the mode of observation is produced by the object ...
Are we producing a guide that we want to exist or producing a document of what happened (a bit of both?)
Name the things that we might otherwise take for granted.
How do we name what's different about software and observation across time, without rendering the new or the old into an ideal?
A quite litteral, chronological list: based on the week, based on the observations of/that were experimented with the week

[[warning: "our methods for observation, like mapping, come with their luggage." from Thursday afternoon section of http://observatory.constantvzw.org/etherdump/toc.md.diff.html ]]
[[warning: some of these methods are not suitable for agile software/SaaS observation]]

TEMPLATE FOR DESCRIBING PROPOSED METHODS:

##BEFOREHAND




##WEDNESDAY:



##THURSDAY:




##FRIDAY:



##SATURDAY


##SUNDAY



##MONDAY






##POST





An overview of related software observation experiments with co-presence, experience, movement, performance.



Methods for inadequate observation of software?



I think about methods as ways of knowing. One way to handle the publication/documentation tension would be to structure a publication around a set of ways of knowing/methods and then select and shape documentation from the worksession as samples of these methods or taking moments from the workshop as prompts for reflection on these methods. Some of the play would come in from the mix of recognizable and common methods (visit a museum (ie. Namur and Leuven), conduct interviews (ie. with Jean Heuns but also as Relational software observatory consultancy service), organize and hold a worksession (ie. what we did), listen to an expert (ie. sidechannel)) with the less common ones (ie. create a bestiary of software logos, engaging with code through collective reading/performance, etc). 




Chapters/sections

-possible groupings..

FLOWS
flow-regulation, logistics, seamlessness
continuous integration
fountains (refreshment)
etherpad->md->pdf->anything pipeline
flowcharts excercise (Flow of the chart - chart of the flow on demand!)
embodied flowchart-elevator

temporality
flux
time-piece 
tempo of agile software/SaaS

resistance
useless scroll against productivity
Interface Détournement

languaging
aquine 
glossary-excercise?
qualifiers (secure, bad, bourgeois, queer..)

healing
relational software observatory consultancy service
retrospection
Agile Sun Salutation
hand reading
when dirty.db gets dirty

close encounters
visiting a museum
interviews
asking the same question
getting down in your computer functioning (files/processes/ram)
relational software observatory consultancy service
with your future?blobservation

embodiment/body techniques
Agile Sun Salutation: see Healing
COLLECTIVE CHAIR YOGA!!!
fountain 
comportment of software (occupational hazards)

collections
bestiary of software logos (we collect)
computer history museum (institutional collection)
jean heuns collection at leuven (personal/institutional)
Testing the testbed: testing software with observatory ambitions


beingontheside/inthemiddle/behind
somethinginthemiddlemaybe
elevator
side channel attacks

Methods for inadequate observation of software [inadequate methods?]

but then the things in these groupings can be arranged/divided by form? like descrptive entries/ exercises/ diagrams/ conversation with/ gloss/

WARNINGS
[[warning: "our methods for observation, like mapping, come with their luggage." from Thursday afternoon section of http://observatory.constantvzw.org/etherdump/toc.md.diff.html ]]
[[warning: some of these methods are not suitable for agile software/SaaS observation]]