metadata of the archive/notes:
    author : who has written the notes?
    which semester is it and what year?
    serie : who has made the lecture? (for example: brian cody.. anselm wagner..)
    institute
author
date
course
lecture?
semester/year



calibre metadata:
 title
 author
 series number 
 tags keywords
 IDs course number
 Date (added to calibre)
 Date (publishing date) maybe date of the lecture, 
 publisher nickname
 language


issues:
    privacy of the authors? nicknames? anonymus?
    nickname, or real name? user can choose

relation to archpoint-x : 
    maybe a more library-like approach to the data (metadata)
    research resource, comparision between the notes
    search for all notes to a speial course
    benefits of a physical library 
    project should not rely on one person, so it cannot dissapear too fast
    creating useful content: you shoud not have to search hours to find useful data for you
    support for archpoint-x and support FOR archpoint-x
    maybe collaboration (digitalisation of content)
    coexistence
    
is it necessary?
ask professors to help (upload into the library), later in the process
we want to have the izk as the owner of our new "project"
the library as a place for self organising

"paying" to donwoald? good or bad? is it in the spirit of a public library?

scan and upload on archpoint- x-----later contact with the member(s) of the website (maybe)

it should be for free