Court cases from the near future -- initial planning meeting
Stuttgart, February 19-21, 2016

0. Who was present:

Clemens Apprich (DCLR, Leuphana University), Balázs Bodó (Institute for Information Law, Amsterdam), Ted Byfield (independent scholar, moderator of <nettime>, NYC), Gary Hall (Coventry University), Mario Doulis (Merz Akademie, Stuttgart), Rosemary Grennan (MayDay Rooms. London), Maximilian Lehner (Akademie Schloss Solitude, art, science & business), Björn Kühn (artist, Stuttgart), Antonia Maja?a (Institute for Contemporary Art,TU Graz), Marcell Mars (Memory of the World/Multimedia Institute, Zagreb), Tomislav Medak (Memory of the World/Multimedia Institute, Zagreb), Anna Romanenko (artist, Stuttgart), Dubravka Sekuli? (ETH Zürich), Femke Snelting (Constant, Brussels), Felix Stalder (moderator of <nettime>, Zurich University of Arts), Dennis Tenen (Columbia University, NYC), Milica Tomic (Institute for Contemporary Art, TU Graz), Sophie-Charlotte Tieroff (Akademie Schloss Solitude, art, science & business), Alan Toner (political activist, Berlin), Marek Tuszynski (Tactical Technology Collective, Berlin), Mira Witte (Akademie Schloss Solitude, art, science & business)

1. What happened in the Stuttgart meeting:

We convened in Stuttgart to discuss what activities both we individually and our organizational structures could develop to support the cause of digital libraries that provide universal access to books and articles, sometime in disregard of the copyright regulation and commercial interests of publishers. While Marcell and Tom initially proposed to pursue a process of research play that would lead up to an enactment of a court case against the Public Library and/or Science Hub projects, the experience by some of the people in the meeting with the copyright reform suggest that the efforts made to transform the legal regulation always resulted in more restrictive environment. Thus we should better separate the deffensive - lega - and offensive - political/public - strategy. The sentiment is that we can make a better public case for these libraries by providing a looser yet broader coalition that will focus on providing them with stronger support in terms of technological infrastructure and redundancy, research on the use scenarios, documenting of discontent with the publishing industry, publicly arguing the case for universal access and these libraries, and ultimately broadening the coalition by bringing on board new individual and organizational allies, particularly with respect to the multiplicity of global positions.

The coalition will assume a new identity -- Society for Library Access/SLAX.net -- and will act separate from Custodians.online, which remains a more radical, activist flank of our activities, and individual library projects in our orbit -- Aaaaaarg, Monoskop, Ubu, Public Library/Memory of the World, Libgen etc.

The activities that should have taken the form of enactment of a court case will take another format - that of forensis as developed by Research Arcitecture and foregrounding the process of providing evidence in a public forum, a form that is less legally codified and more politically situated.

Particular attention was placed on the acts of acknowledging and normalizing practices of book sharing that are now part and parcel of educational and scientific process, with emphasis on developing a course in amateur librarianship that could be developed together and taught at the universities.

The meeting was highly productive, with a number of follow-up proposals that we list in the next segment and that will continue to be developed. As this is a summary, we kindly ask everyone to let us know what was left out and you think is worth pursuing. We indicate some action points at the end of this document, but again we're sure much was left out. More detailed notes to refresh your memory you can, thanks to the wonderful note-taking skills of Femke Snelting, find in the pads here: http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/courtcasesfromthefuture and here: http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/courtcases.activities.

2. Proposed future activities:







3. Action points

Wiki & network:






Legal defense in the Aaaaarg case:

Follow-up meetings:



New activities:




Funding: